A small HDM2 antagonist peptide and a USP7 inhibitor synergistically inhibit the p53-HDM2-USP7 circuit.

HDM2, an E3 ubiquitin ligase, is a crucial regulator of many proliferation-related pathways. It is also one of the primary regulators of p53. USP7, a deubiquitinase, also plays a key role in the regulation of both p53 and HDM2, thus forming a small regulatory network with them. This network has emerged as an important drug target. Development of a synergistic combination targeting both proteins is desirable and important for regulating this module. We have developed a small helically constrained peptide that potently inhibited p53-HDM2 interaction and exerted anti-proliferative effects on p53+/+ cells. A combination of this peptide-when attached to cell entry and nuclear localization tags-and a USP7 inhibitor showed synergistic anti-proliferative effects against cells harboring wild-type alleles of p53. Synergistic inhibition of two important drug targets may lead to novel therapeutic strategies.

The NFκB signaling system in the generation of B-cell subsets: from germinal center B cells to memory B cells and plasma cells.

Memory B cells and antibody-secreting cells are the two prime effector B cell populations that drive infection- and vaccine-induced long-term antibody-mediated immunity. The antibody-mediated immunity mostly relies on the formation of specialized structures within secondary lymphoid organs, called germinal centers (GCs), that facilitate the interactions between B cells, T cells, and antigen-presenting cells. Antigen-activated B cells may proliferate and differentiate into GC-independent plasmablasts and memory B cells or differentiate into GC B cells. The GC B cells undergo proliferation coupled to somatic hypermutation of their immunoglobulin genes for antibody affinity maturation. Subsequently, affinity mature GC B cells differentiate into GC-dependent plasma cells and memory B cells. Here, we review how the NFκB signaling system controls B cell proliferation and the generation of GC B cells, plasmablasts/plasma cells, and memory B cells. We also identify and discuss some important unanswered questions in this connection.

Membrane surface recognition by the ASAP1 PH domain and consequences for interactions with the small GTPase Arf1.

Adenosine diphosphate-ribosylation factor (Arf) guanosine triphosphatase-activating proteins (GAPs) are enzymes that need to bind to membranes to catalyze the hydrolysis of guanosine triphosphate (GTP) bound to the small GTP-binding protein Arf. Binding of the pleckstrin homology (PH) domain of the ArfGAP With SH3 domain, ankyrin repeat and PH domain 1 (ASAP1) to membranes containing phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate [PI(4,5)P2] is key for maximum GTP hydrolysis but not fully understood. By combining nuclear magnetic resonance, neutron reflectometry, and molecular dynamics simulation, we show that binding of multiple PI(4,5)P2 molecules to the ASAP1 PH domain (i) triggers a functionally relevant allosteric conformational switch and (ii) maintains the PH domain in a well-defined orientation, allowing critical contacts with an Arf1 mimic to occur. Our model provides a framework to understand how binding of the ASAP1 PH domain to PI(4,5)P2 at the membrane may play a role in the regulation of ASAP1.

Interaction of the N terminus of ADP-ribosylation factor with the PH domain of the GTPase-activating protein ASAP1 requires phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate.

Arf GAP with Src homology 3 domain, ankyrin repeat, and pleckstrin homology (PH) domain 1 (ASAP1) is a multidomain GTPase-activating protein (GAP) for ADP-ribosylation factor (ARF)-type GTPases. ASAP1 affects integrin adhesions, the actin cytoskeleton, and invasion and metastasis of cancer cells. ASAP1's cellular function depends on its highly-regulated and robust ARF GAP activity, requiring both the PH and the ARF GAP domains of ASAP1, and is modulated by phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2). The mechanistic basis of PIP2-stimulated GAP activity is incompletely understood. Here, we investigated whether PIP2 controls binding of the N-terminal extension of ARF1 to ASAP1's PH domain and thereby regulates its GAP activity. Using [Δ17]ARF1, lacking the N terminus, we found that PIP2 has little effect on ASAP1's activity. A soluble PIP2 analog, dioctanoyl-PIP2 (diC8PIP2), stimulated GAP activity on an N terminus-containing variant, [L8K]ARF1, but only marginally affected activity on [Δ17]ARF1. A peptide comprising residues 2-17 of ARF1 ([2-17]ARF1) inhibited GAP activity, and PIP2-dependently bound to a protein containing the PH domain and a 17-amino acid-long interdomain linker immediately N-terminal to the first ß-strand of the PH domain. Point mutations in either the linker or the C-terminal α-helix of the PH domain decreased [2-17]ARF1 binding and GAP activity. Mutations that reduced ARF1 N-terminal binding to the PH domain also reduced the effect of ASAP1 on cellular actin remodeling. Mutations in the ARF N terminus that reduced binding also reduced GAP activity. We conclude that PIP2 regulates binding of ASAP1's PH domain to the ARF1 N terminus, which may partially regulate GAP activity.

Mutant and Wild-Type Tumor Suppressor p53 Induces p300 Autoacetylation.

The transcriptional co-activator p300 is essential for p53 transactivation, although its precise role remains unclear. We report that p53 activates the acetyltransferase activity of p300 through the enhancement of p300 autoacetylation. Autoacetylated p300 accumulates near the transcription start sites accompanied by a similar enrichment of activating histone marks near those sites. Abrogation of p53-p300 interaction by a site-directed peptide inhibitor abolished p300-mediated histone acetylation, suggesting a crucial role played by the activation in p53-mediated gene regulation. Gain-of-function mutant p53, known to impart aggressive proliferative properties in tumor cells, also activates p300 autoacetylation. The same peptide abolished many of the gain-of-function properties of mutant p53 as well. Reversal of gain-of-function properties of mutant p53 suggests that molecules targeting the p53-p300 interface may be good candidates for anti-tumor drugs.

Enhanced basepair dynamics pre-disposes protein-assisted flips of key bases in DNA strand separation during transcription initiation.

Localized separation of strands of duplex DNA is a necessary step in many DNA-dependent processes, including transcription and replication. Little is known about how these strand separations occur. The strand-separated E.coli RNA polymerase-promoter open-complex structure showed four bases of the non-template strand, the master base -11A, -7, -6 and +2, in a flipped state and inserted into protein pockets. To explore whether any property of these bases in the duplex state pre-disposes them to flipping, NMR studies were performed on a wild-type promoter in the duplex state. Measurement of relaxation times indicates that a limited number of base pairs, including the flipped ones, have faster opening rates than the rest. Molecular dynamics studies also show an inherently high dynamic character of the -11A:T base pair in the wild-type strand-paired state. In order to explore the role of the RNA polymerase in the flipping process, we have used 2-aminopurine as a fluorescent probe. Slower kinetics of the increase of 2-aminopurine fluorescence was observed with RNA polymerases containing several mutant σ70s. This may be interpreted as the protein playing an important role in enhancing the flipping rate. These results suggest that flipping of -11A, and perhaps other flipped bases observed in the open-complex, is facilitated by its inherent proclivity to open-up with further assistance from the protein, thus leading to a strand-open state. Other DNA-based processes that require strand-separation may use similar pathways for strand separation. We conclude that not only basepair stability, but also dynamics may play an important role in the strand-separation.

Allosteric properties of PH domains in Arf regulatory proteins.

Pleckstrin Homology (PH) domains bind phospholipids and proteins. They are critical regulatory elements of a number enzymes including guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs) and GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs) for Ras-superfamily guanine nucleotide binding proteins such as ADP-ribosylation factors (Arfs). Recent studies have indicated that many PH domains may bind more than one ligand cooperatively. Here we discuss the molecular basis of PH domain-dependent allosteric behavior of 2 ADP-ribosylation factor exchange factors, Grp1 and Brag2, cooperative binding of ligands to the PH domains of Grp1 and the Arf GTPase-activating protein, ASAP1, and the consequences for activity of the associated catalytic domains.

Molecular Basis for Cooperative Binding of Anionic Phospholipids to the PH Domain of the Arf GAP ASAP1.

We have defined the molecular basis for association of the PH domain of the Arf GAP ASAP1 with phospholipid bilayers. Structures of the unliganded and dibutyryl PtdIns(4,5)P2-bound PH domain were solved. PtdIns(4,5)P2 made contact with both a canonical site (C site) and an atypical site (A site). We hypothesized cooperative binding of PtdIns(4,5)P2 to the C site and a nonspecific anionic phospholipid to the A site. PtdIns(4,5)P2 dependence of binding to large unilamellar vesicles and GAP activity was sigmoidal, consistent with cooperative sites. In contrast, PtdIns(4,5)P2 binding to the PH domain of PLC δ1 was hyperbolic. Mutation of amino acids in either the C or A site resulted in decreased PtdIns(4,5)P2-dependent binding to vesicles and decreased GAP activity. The results support the idea of cooperative phospholipid binding to the C and A sites of the PH domain of ASAP1. We propose that the mechanism underlies rapid switching between active and inactive ASAP1.

Indirect read-out of the promoter DNA by RNA polymerase in the closed complex.

Transcription is initiated when RNA polymerase recognizes the duplex promoter DNA in the closed complex. Due to its transient nature, the closed complex has not been well characterized. How the initial promoter recognition occurs may offer important clues to regulation of transcription initiation. In this article, we have carried out single-base pair substitution experiments on two Escherichia coli promoters belonging to two different classes, the -35 and the extended -10, under conditions which stabilize the closed complex. Single-base pair substitution experiments indicate modest base-specific effects on the stability of the closed complex of both promoters. Mutations of base pairs in the -10 region affect the closed complexes of two promoters differently, suggesting different modes of interaction of the RNA polymerase and the promoter in the two closed complexes. Two residues on σ(70) which have been suggested to play important role in promoter recognition, Q437 and R436, were mutated and found to have different effects on the closed-complex stability. DNA circular dichroism (CD) and FRET suggest that the promoter DNA in the closed complex is distorted. Modeling suggests two different orientations of the recognition helix of the RNA polymerase in the closed complex. We propose that the RNA polymerase recognizes the sequence dependent conformation of the promoter DNA in the closed complex.

Differential recognition of phosphorylated transactivation domains of p53 by different p300 domains.

Histone acetyltransferases form crucial links in transducing extrinsic signals to actual initiation of transcription. A multitude of stress signal integrations occur through the interaction of p300 with p53 phosphorylated at different residues of the transactivation domain. How such interactions activate different gene expression programs remains largely unknown. p300 contains at least five domains that are known to interact with p53, but their role in transcription regulation is not known. We measured the binding affinity of various phosphorylated transactivation domains towards several p53 binding domains of p300 by fluorescence anisotropy. The binding affinities of different phosphorylated transactivation domains of p53 towards different domains of p300 vary by several orders of magnitude, indicating that interactions of different post-translationally modified forms of p53 may occur through different domains of p300. Thus, different post-translationally modified p53 fragments may form transcription-initiating complexes of different configurations, leading to the activation of different promoters and pathways.